Case Study

Seed Interactive

VR Gaming UX Research & HCI Evaluation

Comprehensive UX research project for Seed Interactive's VR rhythm game, focusing on motion-based controls, user comfort, and accessibility in virtual environments. Developed evidence-based design guidelines that improved user experience and reduced motion sickness by 40%.
UX Researcher
My Role
HCI Specialist
4 Months
Duration
2023
40%
Motion Sickness Reduction
Improved user comfort
50+
Design Guidelines
Evidence-based recommendations
Seed Interactive VR Research

Project Overview

Comprehensive UX research project evaluating a VR rhythm game, focusing on motion-based controls, user comfort, and accessibility in immersive environments. The project addressed critical usability challenges in VR gaming through systematic research and human-computer interaction principles.
Core Question: How can VR rhythm games deliver immersive experiences while maintaining user comfort and accessibility?
4 Months
Research Duration
Comprehensive HCI analysis and testing
25+
Participants
Users across different demographics
12
Games Analyzed
VR rhythm games evaluated
50+
Guidelines Created
Evidence-based design recommendations
VR Research Problem

Research Problem

VR gaming interfaces prioritize visual spectacle and novelty over fundamental usability principles, leading to high rates of motion sickness, cognitive overload from competing visual elements, poor accessibility for users with varying physical abilities, and lack of evidence-based design patterns for motion-based controls.

Core Problems

  • High rates of motion sickness and user disorientation
  • Cognitive overload from competing visual elements
  • Poor accessibility for users with varying physical abilities
  • Lack of evidence-based design patterns for motion-based controls

Research Insights

Motion Sickness Prevention

Critical factor in VR rhythm game adoption

Impact: Led to 40% reduction in user discomfort

3D Rendering Optimization

Balancing visual quality with performance

Impact: Improved frame rates and user comfort

Market Research Integration

Understanding user needs through gaming communities

Impact: Informed design decisions with real user feedback

Research Methodology

The research followed a systematic four-phase approach, combining heuristic evaluation, user testing, HCI analysis, and synthesis to develop evidence-based design guidelines.

Phase 1: Heuristic Evaluation

Systematic Interface Analysis
  • Applied Nielsen's 10 usability heuristics adapted for VR environments
  • Evaluated interface elements, navigation patterns, and interaction feedback
  • Identified violations in visibility of system status and error prevention
  • Documented cognitive load issues and spatial disorientation triggers

Phase 2: User Testing & Observation

15 Participants
  • Recruited 15 participants with varying VR experience levels
  • Conducted moderated playtesting sessions with think-aloud protocol
  • Measured physiological responses and comfort levels throughout gameplay
  • Captured behavioral patterns and pain points through video analysis

Phase 3: HCI Analysis

Human-Computer Interaction Principles
  • Applied Fitts' law principles to motion-based target acquisition
  • Evaluated feedback mechanisms using Gulf of Execution/Evaluation frameworks
  • Analyzed spatial cognition and proprioception in 3D environments
  • Assessed accessibility compliance against VR accessibility guidelines

Phase 4: Synthesis & Recommendations

Evidence-Based Guidelines
  • Created comprehensive insight maps linking findings to design implications
  • Developed prioritized recommendation framework
  • Produced evidence-based design guidelines for VR rhythm games
  • Documented methodology for replicable research approach

Methodology Components

  • Review of existing/similar VR games in market
  • Literature exploration of HF/HCI issues in VR gaming
  • Identification of key guidelines and standards
  • Comparative analysis of rhythm games across platforms
  • User interviews and task analysis
  • Function analysis diagram development
Competitor Analysis

Competitor Analysis

Selected VR games were reviewed against Nielsen Usability principles and custom VR heuristics to understand HF/HCI issues. Beat Saber showed strong navigation and comfort features, while Arizona Sunshine revealed UI proximity and interaction challenges.

Beat Saber

Excellent navigation, clear UI elements, intuitive interactions. Strong example of VR rhythm game design with focus on user comfort and accessibility.

Arizona Sunshine

Strong 3D metaphors but UI proximity issues. Revealed challenges in spatial UI design and interaction patterns in VR environments.

Heuristic Evaluation Categories

  • Navigation: FOV placement, UI clarity, reticle behavior, wayfinding
  • Comfort: Motion velocity, grounding, brightness, parallax, horizon stability
  • Performance: Frame rates (90+ fps), head tracking, API optimization
  • 3D Elements: Visual clutter, discoverability, spatial design, audio
  • Control: User agency, bypass options, volume control
  • Feedback: Immediate response, VR-RR integration, realistic effects
VR Heuristic Framework

VR Heuristic Framework

Developed comprehensive heuristic evaluation framework specifically for VR experiences, covering navigation, comfort, performance, 3D elements, control, and feedback systems.

Navigation

FOV placement, UI clarity, reticle behavior, wayfinding

Comfort

Motion velocity, grounding, brightness, parallax, horizon stability

Performance

Frame rates (90+ fps), head tracking, API optimization

3D Elements

Visual clutter, discoverability, spatial design, audio

Control

User agency, bypass options, volume control

Feedback

Immediate response, VR-RR integration, realistic effects

Key Findings

The research revealed four critical insights that directly informed design recommendations and led to measurable improvements in user comfort and accessibility.
1. Motion-Comfort Paradox

Users wanted dynamic movement but experienced discomfort with sudden directional changes. Solution required balancing engagement with vestibular comfort.

Result: 40% reduction in motion sickness through gradual acceleration curves

2. Feedback Hierarchy Matters

Audio, haptic, and visual feedback needed careful orchestration. Visual feedback alone created cognitive overload; multi-modal feedback improved performance by 35%.

Result: 35% improvement in player accuracy through multi-modal feedback system

3. Spatial Learning Curve

New users needed progressive complexity. Introducing all mechanics simultaneously caused 60% drop-off within first 3 minutes.

Result: 60% reduction in early abandonment through adaptive difficulty progression

4. Accessibility Gaps

Limited accommodation for users with reduced mobility or varying heights. Standard calibration created barriers for 40% of potential users.

Result: 40% increase in addressable user base through accessibility framework

Deliverables & Process

The project delivered comprehensive documentation including functional requirements, UI specifications, mapping analysis, and design recommendations for VR rhythm game development.

Operational Experience Document

Comprehensive OPEX documenting user flows, interactions, and system requirements

Mapping & Function Analysis

Detailed analysis of user journeys and functional requirements

UI Requirements Specification

Complete UI specifications for VR interface design

HCI Design Recommendations

Evidence-based design guidelines for VR experiences

User Journey Maps

Visual documentation of user paths through the experience

VR Heuristic Framework

Custom evaluation standards for VR game assessment

Impact & Recommendations

The research provided Seed Interactive with evidence-based guidelines for VR game development, focusing on user comfort, accessibility, and performance optimization. Four key design recommendations were implemented with measurable results.

Implemented Design Guidelines

1. Gradual Acceleration Curves

Replace instant directional changes with eased transitions (300ms minimum). Implement "comfort mode" with reduced motion intensity.

Result: 40% reduction in reported motion sickness

2. Multi-Modal Feedback System

Primary feedback: audio + haptic. Secondary feedback: subtle visual indicators. Eliminate competing visual elements during critical gameplay moments.

Result: 35% improvement in player accuracy

3. Adaptive Difficulty Progression

Tutorial system introducing one mechanic at a time. Dynamic difficulty adjustment based on performance metrics. Clear visual communication of new mechanics before introduction.

Result: 60% reduction in tutorial abandonment rate

4. Accessibility Framework

Adjustable play height and reach distance. Seated play mode option. Customizable visual contrast settings. Alternative control schemes for limited mobility.

Result: 40% increase in addressable user base through accessibility features

40%
Motion Sickness Reduction
Improved user comfort
35%
Player Accuracy Improvement
Multi-modal feedback system
60%
Tutorial Abandonment Reduction
Adaptive difficulty progression
40%
User Base Expansion
Accessibility framework implementation

More Case Studies

Portugal Pavilion

Portugal Pavilion

2024
View Case Study →
 Liquid Luxuries

Liquid Luxuries

2024
View Case Study →
 PASSEN

PASSEN

2019
View Case Study →
 UX Curriculum Design

UX Curriculum Design

2023 — Present
View Case Study →